4.11) Tradition and word of mouth.  Following Herodotus statement that it was built for Cheops, the Egyptian high priest Manetho stated in the 3rd century BC, that it was built by Suphis. (Sophis incidentally, is also the ancient Egyptian name for Orion; thus the Sothic year). What Manetho also said was that this Suphis was buried on an island surrounded by water, which is obviously contradiction to the 'pyramids as tomb's' theory. Perhaps this statement was a reference to the layout of the pyramids, which have been compared to Orion's belt.

While many of the original testimonies vary in detail, the name 'Khufu' is constantly repeated in relation to the great pyramid (HWFW, Khufu, Shufu, Suphis, Cheops, Chephren, Shephren etc). It must be remembered however, that with the possible exception of Manetho, most references are based on the original testimony of Herodotus.

It is worth exploring the name 'Khufu' a little further here:

Egyptologists explain that Khufu's name had become 'a powerful charm', and was put on monuments as a sign of sanctity and protection. In other words, it was used in later times as the sign of the cross has been used in Christian countries for nearly two thousand years. Of course, we do not assume that every representation of a person bearing the symbol of a cross is Jesus Christ, nor that every building with a cross was personally ordered to be built by Jesus. Neither do we assume that every person named Jesus is the original Jesus Christ.

In relation to this, Fix cites evidence to show that the quarry-marks and cartouches that have been used to attribute pyramids to kings may have been misinterpreted. Some of the cartouches of 4th-dynasty kings may originally have been sacred symbols identifying different schools of religious thought, rather than primarily the names of individual pharaohs. The historically known kings Khufu, Khafre, and Menkaure may well have appropriated, and possibly restored, the three Giza pyramids as their own memorial monuments, and may have been responsible for some of the surrounding auxiliary structures -- small subsidiary pyramids, temples, tombs, and boat pits -- but there is no conclusive evidence that they started and finished the three major pyramids themselves.

'The very able D. Davidson shows a positive engineering proof, eight definite proofs in fact, that Cheops' body was never interred in the Great Pyramid' (7).

(Personal note: Having read the book, I can find no justification for this statement).

Comment - There is no question that the name Khufu (Cheops) and its several variations have been associated with the structure since at least Herodotus time. The discovery of 'Khufu' (and Khnum Khufu), inscriptions inside the relieving chambers supports this connection. The fact that this integral information about the structure was independently preserved orally by the Egyptian priesthood for thousands of years is a testimony to both the priesthood and the oral tradition itself.

4.12) The 'Dream' and 'Inventory' Stellae - The now in-famous granite 'Dream stela', found between the paws of the Sphinx, was erected around 1400 BC  by Thutmosis IV(1401-1391BC), the eighteenth dynasty pharaoh, following a dream.

The stele contradicts the idea that Khafre built the Sphinx as it suggests that Giza was in use prior to Khufu's time. (i.e. the Sphinx, Valley temple, etc).

It records that prior to Thutmosis IV ; 'the great magical power that existed in this place from the beginning of time', had been covered up to its neck in sand. The line that has caused such debate is line 13, which says ...

.....'and we shall give praise to Wenofer.........Khaf...........the statue made for Atum-Hor-em-Akhet'...

Gaston Maspero said of it in 1900 - 'The stela of the sphinx bears, on line 13, the syllable 'Khaf' in the middle of a gap...There, I believe, is an indication of (a renovation and clearance) of the sphinx carried out under this prince, and consequently the more or less certain proof that the sphinx was already covered with sand during the time of his predecessors'. (In other words; Thutmosis restored the sphinx and gave credit to an earlier restoration by Khafre). Unfortunately the words on either side of the syllable are missing, and there was no cartouche ever recorded. Whatever word the syllable was part of, and it seems possible that it was 'Khafre', there are no other words on the stele that sing praise for his building either the sphinx or the 2nd pyramid. It also credits 'khaf' with the construction of one of the temple buildings but mentions no praise for the far greater achievement of constructing the pyramid, or sphinx.

Comment - This is circumstantial evidence and on its own proves nothing. Why is there no cartouche?

Also in apparent contradiction to the established opinion is the limestone 'Inventory' stela, also found at Giza by Auguste Mariette in the 1850's, in the ruins of the Temple of Isis-

Long live The King of Upper and Lower Egypt, Khufu, given life

He found the house of Isis, Mistress of the Pyramid, by the side of the hollow of Hwran (The Sphinx) and he built his pyramid beside the temple of this goddess and he built a pyramid for the King's daughter Henutsen beside this temple.

The place of Hwran Horemakhet is on the South side of the House of Isis, Mistress of the pyramid

He restored the statue, all covered in painting, of the guardian of the athmosphere, who guides the winds with his gaza.

He replaced the back part of the Nemes head-dress, which was missing with gilded stone

The figure of this god, cut in stone, is solid and will last to eternity, keeping its face looking always to the East '(10).

The inscription appears to states that Khufu built a pyramid for the Princess Henutson beside the temple of the goddess (Archeology confirms this with the southernmost of the three small pyramids beside the great pyramid). It also makes it clear that Khufu saw the sphinx. Since Khufu, who was supposed to have built the great pyramid, was Khafre's father, how can Khafre have built the sphinx?

The stele was found after Vyse' markings and was declared a 'forgery' by archaeologists. It is argued that the names 'Hwran' and 'Horemakhet' were not used until the 18^th Dynasty, and that the Isis temple was built into, and out of, a temple that was attached to the satellite pyramid - which in turn was attached to the Great pyramid (10). James Henry Breasted had it put into his section of protocols from the 4th dynasty and therefore seemed to believe that it was genuine.

If one compares the original translation of Breasted with the version Sitchin has in his book, some discrepancies show up. Here is Breasted's version:

'Live the Horus: Mezer, King of Upper and Lower Egypt: Khufu, who is given life. He found the house of Isis, Mistress of the Pyramid, beside the house of the Sphinx of [Harmakhis] on the north-west of the house of Osiris, Lord of Rosta. He built his pyramid beside the temple of this goddess, and he built a pyramid for the king's-daughter Henutsen beside this temple'.

In Fact, there are two pyramids mentioned; One for Khufu and one for his daughter. Sitchin also says that Chufu 'founded' the temple of Isis. But in the original translation we can read that he actually 'found' the temple.

Note - On most Stelae, the proportions of the Sphinx are shown more in accordance with the standard design of sphinxes after the Great Sphinx, but it is interesting to note that the Dream Stele itself depicts the proportions of head and body a little closer to the real Sphinx than the rest; this Stele of Tuthmosis IV between the Sphinx's paws shows no crown on its two Sphinx representations and the beard is of the divine pattern. On the Dream Stele, no statue is shown before the Sphinx's breast, though many others do show it there.

4.20) Criticism of the tomb theory - It is important to 'keep in context' over this issue However, the truth is that there are a number of anomalous features of the great pyramid that are not contextual. The Great Pyramid is the only pyramid built with an ascending system of passages.  All the other pyramids only have a descending system with the 'coffer' placed below. Also there are a number of specific design features that suggest that the pyramid may not have been built to house a body after all. What evidence is there that it was a tomb? The empty coffer is appealing but there are no original funerary hieroglyphics, paintings or inscriptions to be found on or in the Great Pyramid or the coffer.  Almost all the other funerary monuments in Egypt are covered with protective funerary inscriptions.  It is unlikely that a King would have been buried there with no inscriptions and paintings for his tomb, as these were a form of afterlife protection. The spells and texts of this period are expected.

Note: Looking at the other contemporary 'Heliopean' pyramids (and therefore keeping in context), we find that they all show similar construction features (portcullises, corbels, corner sockets, casing stones, etc), none have funerary inscriptions and none have produced an original body.

 

Petrie (12), makes an interesting observation concerning Herodotus' claim that 'Cheops' was buried 'in a subterranean region, on an island there surrounded by the waters of the Nile'. He first calculates that in order for the Nile waters to 'surround' the coffer, it needs to be another fifty feet below the existing 'subterranean' chamber. He then produces a candidate for the chamber. 'Exactly such a locality, too, both sepulchral, and with the required hydraulic conditions, has since been discovered about 1,000 ft S. East of the pyramid building'. (Plate XIX). The structure is a large and deep pit on the square and bottom of which rests an 'antique, rude sarcophagus of very gigantic proportions'. The pit is surrounded by a trench, which is deep enough to descend below the adjacent waters of the Nile, allowing it to fill with water. It is called 'Campbell's' tomb.

If the super-pyramids were constructed primarily to house the tombs of Pharahos, why place another coffer in the queens chamber of the Great pyramid and why is the Kings-chamber coffer so small that if we were to place a fully mummified 'body' in it, we would be dealing with the tomb of a child and not an adult. Why are coffers found still sealed in their original condition, only to be found empty on opening them and why build more than one pyramid? These are the questions which have yet to be satisfactorily answered before the 'pyramids as tombs' theory can be fully accepted.

4.30) Other Theories. - There are enough inconsistencies in the 'tomb' theory to warrant looking at some of the other theories.

Apart from the 'Tomb' theory, there are a number of other reasonable suggestions, such as: That Giza served as a geodetic marker, an 'Initiation' centre, an Astronomical observatory, a Religious/Cult centre or a Suppository for Knowledge. Perhaps, and most likely, it has served as a product of more than one of these influences at different times?

The 'Hitat', a collection of Arab writings, contains  17 different accounts concerning the pyramids. Most of them refer to different builders yet at the same time most do give the reason for building it as a 'tomb'. However, even the author of the Hitat himself, al-Makrizi, could not make up his mind and discusses some of the contradicting positions of the sources he used -

"There are people who say: The first Hermes, who is threefold as prophet, king and wise one (it is the one called by the Hebrews Henoch, son of Jared, son of Mahalahel, son of Kenan, son of Enos, son of Seth, son of Adam - praise with him - and that is Idris), he read in the stars that a great Flood was imminent....And it is said, that the builder of the pyramids is a king with the name Saurid b. Sahluk b. Sarjak, whereas others claim that the two pyramids at al-Fustat were built by Saddad b. And because of a dream. But the Copts are denying that the Amalekites conquered Egypt and think, that the pyramids were built by Saurid'.

The following are some of the more reasonable theories.

4.31) A Geodetic marker - There has been in the past, research that demonstrated the inclusion of geometry and astronomy in the dimensions of the pyramid. and Giza The neatly encapsulated dimensions of the Earth in the pyramid's dimensions, lend weight to the theory that Giza is a 'Marker' of the 30th parallel, a latitude which was had a significance to other 'sacred' sites in the past. These include Giza (Heliopolis), then moving East, Eridu 'King-ship moved there after the flood', Persepolis (No-one lived there in 600 BC), Harappa and Lhasa (exactly 30 degrees East).

Perhaps it is just a coincidence, but it is fact that the dimensions of the Grat pyramid represent the earth's northern hemisphere on a scale of 1:43,200: I'ts perimeter equals a half minute of latitude at the equator; the perimeter of the corner sockets equals a half minute of equatorial longitude, or 1:43,200 of the earth's circumference; and its height, including the platform, is 1:43,200 of the earth's polar radius.[3] It is only since the carrying out of satellite surveys from space in the 1970s that scientists have obtained measurements of the earth as accurate as those contained in the Pyramid.

Stecchini claimed that a number of other locations throughout the ancient world were located in exact geodetic relation to the longitude meridian of the Great Pyramid. Of these the Persian capital Persepolis, whose location otherwise appears senseless to scholars, is perhaps the most straight forward to explain. Persepolis was located at 30° 00' north latitude, and three units of exactly 7° 12' east of the meridian of the Great Pyramid. The reason for this 7° 12' unit was that the Persian Empire of King Darius the Great was idealized as three geodetic squares of 6° of latitude, stretching from 30° to 36° north. At 33° north, the midpoint of this distance, 6° of latitude is equal to 7° 12' of longitude, thus making these regions true squares. Among the other ancient sites exhibiting similar geodetic precision, according to Stecchini, are: Nimrod, Sardi, Susa, Mycenae, Dodona and Delphi, as well as the Kaaba at Mecca, and Mt. Gerizim, the original Jewish holy center, before it was moved to Jerusalem in 980 BC.

The following assertion made by the pre-eminent Egyptologist, Ludwig Borchardt is typical. He is commenting here on an Egyptian inscription stating that the distance between Behdet (at the northern tip of the Nile Delta) and Syene (at the first cataract near Aswan in the south) was 106 atur, "one must absolutely exclude the possibility that the ancients may have measured in degrees." Borchardt gives absolutely no grounds for this assertion. It is instead invoked as an article of faith. It is ironic that it was Cole's survey of the Great Pyramid, commissioned by Borchardt himself, which provided Stecchini with his best evidence to refute this long standing prejudice. It should be pointed out, however, that Stecchini derived his knowledge of Egyptian geodetic measurement from his reading and interpretation of hundreds, if not thousands, of hieroglyphic texts. In the case of Borchardt's quote cited above, if one simply checks the distance, it does in fact measure 106 geodetic atur. An atur was 15,000 royal cubits, which was also equal to 17,000 of the older geodetic cubits. The figure 106 atur is significant because it is 1/12 of the length of the meridian from the equator to the pole. (This figure translates to 15° latitude).

Piazzi Smyth suggested that the Giza complex was the centre of the world's landmasses.

Hapgood's excellent research on the Piri-reis map demonstrated that the map was centred on the region of Cairo. This same map (and others),  show the outline of the Antarctic continent before it froze over. At present, according to Radio-carbon dating of core samples taken from the Rosss-sea bed, it is estimated that the last time this was possible was at around 4,000 BC.

4.32) Astronomy. - It has long been argued that the Great pyramid embodies certain fundamental astronomical data in its dimensions. Proctor (23) said 'we see in all the Egyptian pyramids the evidence of an astronomical plan'. As there are certain clear evidences of attention to astronomy in the great pyramid, any argument that other discoveries of astronomical figures are 'coincidental' have little merit. Proctor firmly believed that the grand gallery and other passages were designed for determining the declination and ascension of stars.

Apart from the polar shaft, and cardinal alignment, which are obvious astronomical features, it has been long suspected that the great pyramid may have been originally designed as an astronomical observatory. In Le-Measurier's interpretation, he suggests that the pyramid was built in different phases, one of which, up to the level of the 'king's' chamber was for observing the stars, with the rest of the structure being built in a later construction phase and for another purpose. In return, it is argued that the proximity of so many other pyramids, with similar 'funerary' features reveals the true context of the pyramids. However, the very same argument was applied to the British stone circles, where in places like Scotland, where there are arguably too many 'recumbent' circles in some areas to explain in terms of just astronomy.

The British astronomer Richard Proctor, found a reference in the works of the Roman philosopher Proclus in his commentary on Plato's 'Timaeus'.  In 1883 he published 'The Great Pyramid, Observation Tomb, and Temple', in which he suggested, more reasonably, that the Great Pyramid was used as an observatory before its completion. His proposition explains the 'Gallery' in terms of an observation point (thus the evenly spaced holes in the walls), for viewing the transit of the stars (sun). He claimed that the pyramid was used in that state then re-used as a funerary complex later. It has been since discovered that parts of the ascending passage were cut through existing masonry, which supports his theory.

Early Arab historians also support the idea that the Great Pyramid was built as an observatory and that it contained reproductions of the celestial spheres. For example:

Murtadi, in 1584, said that the magical priest Saiouph made his abode, at the time of the deluge, in the pyramid; which, he says "was a temple of the stars, where there was a figure of the sun, and one of the moon, both of which spoke."  He mentions the great grandson of Noah, (Bardesi ?), who, as priest, "applied himself to the worship of the stars." He adds "It is reported that he made the great laws, built the pyramids, and set up for idols the figures of the stars".

The concavity of the great pyramid's faces (and the determination of the equinoxes)

The photo above illustrates the curious optical phenomena that appears on the pyramid without its casing, at dawn and sunset at the time of the equinoxes (around 21 March and 22 Sept), a shadow appears on the south face of the great pyramid, apparently dividing it in half, with the shaded side nearest the sun. The phenomenon occurs because the core-masonry is concave on all four faces by a yard deep. The casing stones that exist show clearly that the finished surface wasn't concave. This strange feature was first illustrated in La Description de l'Egypte in the late 1700's (Volume V, pl. 8). Flinders Petrie noticed a hollowing in the core masonry in the center of each face and wrote that he "continually observed that the courses of the core had dips of as much as ½° to 1°" (The Pyramids and Temples of Gizeh, 1883, p. 421). Though it is apparently more easily observed from the air, the concavity is measurable and is visible from the ground under favorable lighting conditions.

The purpose for the concavity of the Great Pyramids remains a mystery and no satisfactory explanation for this feature has been offered. The indentation is so slight that any practical function is difficult to imagine unless that is its exact function was to highlight the day of the equinoxes)

Maragioglio and Rinaldi described a similar concavity on the pyramid of Menkaure, the third pyramid at Giza. Miroslav Verner wrote that the faces of the Red Pyramid at Dahshur are also "slightly concave."

Comment - An Extraordinary effort was applied in order to achieve this effect. It was deliberately built into the design.

In Ancient Egyptian Construction and Architecture, Clarke and Englebach wrote:

Most pyramids have individual peculiarities which are as yet difficult to explain. For instance, in the Great Pyramid, as possibly in certain others, a large depression in the packing-blocks runs down the middle of each face, implying a line of extra-thick facing there. Though there is no special difficulty in arranging the blocks of a course in such a manner that they increase in size at the middle, there is no satisfactory explanation of the feature any more than there is of the 'girdle-blocks' [in the Great Pyramid's ascending passage] already discussed. [p. 128]

A. Pochan (16), in the thirties (1935) put forward a paper on the subject to the Institute d'Egypt. In response, the following was written in 'La Bourse Egyptienne': 'Yesterday evening, Mr. Pochan, to whom we already owe the discovery of red paint that once covered the pyramids, revealed quite a curious phenomenon to the Institute d'Egypte. It seems that the great pyramid constituted a precision instrument that allowed the date of the equinoxes to be determined exactly to within twelve hours'. Pochan considered this the reason that the door was placed to the side slightly as the feature might have created extra water-ingress had the door been central. However, almost as if to contradict this idea, the second pyramid has no concavity, and yet the door is off-centre; similarly, the third pyramid does have concavity, but a central door.

Comment - The 'solstice effect' is a result of concavity and cardinal alignment. The real question is whether the effect was intentional or not. The concave aspect of the pyramids face suggests that the 'change of plan' theory never applied to the external design, which continued without change (excepting the course heights), to the top. As there is no recognised structural benefit from this design, and considering the dates that the shadow effect occurs (Solstice), it seems reasonable to assume that this SOLAR event might have been deliberately incorporated into the design.

4.325) The Great pyramid as a Solar Temple - It is/was a common feature of 'Solar' temples around the world to be painted red. The use of red paint to denote a religious building is still observed to this day in Tibet (also on the 30^th parallel). Pochan (16) says - ' at the tomb of Pen-Meruw at Giza, the name of the Great pyramid is followed by the determinative reserved for solar temples (This is a pyramid shape, with a small 'pyramidion' on top) and 'Khefre' is one of the Egyptian names for the sun (sunrise, daytime, sunset)'.

The following extract is from Pochan (16), who proved conclusively that the great pyramid, or a part of it, was at some time, painted with red-ochre paint. He says: 'As I proceeded to measure the casing stones of the great pyramid, a peculiar fact attracted my attention. Some detached blocks lined up a few metres from the pyramid, which apparently had once been a part of the facing, showed a curios red-brown tint on their flat sloping side.

To what phenomenon could this tint - which the blocks' other surfaces did not have - be attributed? To time? Light? To the sand - as unferruginous as it was - that they had covered the blocks for so long? It is hardly likely, for the other surfaces would have shown beginnings of a similar transformation. Moreover, a knife blade penetrates the coloured surface with difficulty and cuts through the other surfaces easily.

Chemical tests gave me an immediate result: the facing blocks were coated with a paint having a ferrous oxide base (red ochre). Tests carried out on other parts of the sample were negative...', and he continues 'However, it was necessary to verify this fact. The second pyramid still retains part of its casing, which definitely seems to be coloured red fragments taken from the pyramids casing, when subjected to chemical tests, showed the same reaction as those taken from the facing blocks of the great pyramid'. We must also keep in mind that the Sphinx's face is also painted red. Pliny informs us that it was painted because of a cult However; formal proof that the pyramid was painted came to me in the course of a separate examination of the rather deteriorated casing stones found on the pyramids south face. E. Baraize and I ascertained that some of these blocks showed, on their uppermost horizontal surfaces, traces of red paint corresponding to the breaks between the rocks that had been placed directly above them; the coating was clearly thicker and showed fins'.

4.34) The pyramid as an 'Initiation' Centre. - According to the theosophical tradition the Great Pyramid was originally used as a temple of initiation. This idea was researched by Marsham Adams, who in 1895, wrote the book 'The Book of the Master' (...of the Hidden House), in which he showed that 'The soul of the departed is pictured as following the passages and chambers of the great pyramid. In this version the pyramid itself is seen as an allegory in stone of the ways and trials of the future life' (2). To quote Adam's himself, he said that the Egyptian Book of the Dead refers to an "ideal structure and to the passages and chambers therein, and that these passages and chambers followed precisely the order and description of those of the Great Pyramid ". The sacred procession of the Egyptian dead moves silently along as they pass to the tribunal of Osiris. They enter into the Hidden Places and penetrate the secret of the House of Light (compare the ancient Egyptian name for the Great Pyramid - "Khut," or "Light").

Sir Gaston Maspero endorsed this thesis and added: "The Pyramids and the Book of the Dead reproduce the same original, the one in words, the other in stone." Maspero supported the contention that 'The Secret House was the scene where the neophyte was initiated into the mysteries of Egypt'.

What is the Egyptian "Book of the Dead"? It was believed by the ancient Egyptians that the "Book of the Dead" was written by Thoth. He was the scribe to the gods and was the one responsible for speaking the words of creation and putting it into effect. Its name is not a correct description of it. It should be named the "Chapters of the Coming Forth by Day". It is mainly concerned with the state of the departed soul and its trials and existences in the afterlife. According to one of the world's experts on the 'Book of the Dead', Sir Wallis Budge, it was not of Egyptian origin but its ideas were brought to Egypt by a different culture and people.

Ivimy (21), points out the similarities between the 'Bardo Thodol' or 'Tibetan Book of the Dead', from the Buddhist philosophy. He says 'It bears such a remarkable resemblance to the Egyptian Book of the Dead as to suggest that there was some ultimate connection between the two The similarities between the two books is particularly noticeable in regard to the doctrines of the judgment and in the funeral rites they prescribe for the purpose of assisting the deceased to pass successfully through his ordeal. Both treaties are, in effect, "nothing more than guide-books for the traveler in the realm beyond death".

Comment - The visual similarities of the Am-duat are clear. The 12-hours of the 'Duat' may represent the journey taken by the sun on the equinox. 

4.35) The pyramid and religion - It has been claimed that the pyramid is the Bible 'in stone'. Various authors have pointed out that the Ark of the covenant is described as 2.5 cubits long and 1.5 high, which at 25 inches per cubit has the same dimensions as the kings coffer; Similarly, it has been noted that Solomon's 'molten sea' has the same capacity as the kings chamber.

Ivimy (21), suggests that the Sun-god 'Atum', and 'Adam' were one and the same ruler or king

The Bible includes some interesting quotes, which have been interpreted as regarding the pyramid:-

ISIAH 19 : 19, 20  - 'In that day there shall be an alter to the lord in the midst of Egypt, and a pillar at the border thereof to the lord, and it shall be for a sign and for a witness unto the lord of hosts in the land of Egypt'. The significance of this quote is magnified when it is realised that the word 'Alter' in Hebrew means 'The lion of God'. Ezekiel describes the Alter as Pyramidal, and calls it the 'mountain of God'. It is also a geographical fact that the Giza complex is situated at the border of Upper and Lower Egypt, which places it in 'the midst' and at 'the border thereof'. (15)

Henry O'Brien (26) started writing a book in the 1830's called 'The Pyramids of Egypt for the First Time Unveiled'. Unfortunately, he died soon after, and we are bereft of his most excellent insights on the subject. He did, however, include certain observations in his other literature. On the purpose of the pyramids he said: 'Others have fancied them (The pyramids) intended for sepulchers; and as the Egyptians, taught by their ancient Chaldean victors, connected astronomy with their funereal and religious ceremonies, they seem not in his to be far astray, if we but extend the application to their sacred bulls and other animals, and not merely to their kings, as Herodotus would have us suppose. The immense sarcophagus lying in the interior of the first or Great pyramid, with the bone found by the Earl of Munster in the second (Note - Then Major Fitzclarence, March 2^nd 1818), must put this question beyond the possibility of doubt'. The bone he referred to was determined to be the thigh-bone of an ox.  He continues by describing another sarcophagus found by Belzoni at 'Biban el Moluk' ('The gates of the King' or ' the universal king of the ancients'), which was 9ft 5in long, 3ft 9in wide and 2ft 1in high, sounding like a bell and transparent as glass, which he believed was a relic of the Apis cult, supported by the discovery of an embalmed bull in the innermost chamber. (Remebering also the huge discovery of embalmed bulls at Saqqara). O'Brien explores the idea that the 'foreign dynasty', and most specifically Khufu and Khafre were remembered unfavourably by the Egyptians, presumably for 'prohibition of sacrifices and closing the temple doors'. He then asks the reasonable question. Exactly what the particular temples alluded to were? His conclusion was that they were the pyramids.

In support of this theory, O'Brien introduces a fascinating piece of information. He says: 'This conclusion receives additional force from the conversation which Wilford, in his "Dissertation upon Egypt and the Nile" (Asiatic Researches), tells us he had with several learned Brahmins, when, upon describing to them the form and bearings of the great Egyptian pyramid, one of them asked if it had not a communication under ground with the river Cali? Being answered that such communication was spoken of as having once existed, and that a well was still to be seen, they unanimously agreed that it was a temple appropriated to the worship of Padma-devi, and that the supposed tomb was a trough, which, on certain festivals, her priests used to fill with the sacred water and lotus-flowers'.

• The Indus valley culture had a world mountain called 'Mount Meru'. It was also referred to as a world 'spine', as is the 'Djed' of Osiris.

• The Great Pyramid is called the 'Golden mountain' in the sacred Hindu writings (7).

• The Hindoos call it 'Rucm-Adri', or the 'Golden mountain'. 'The sacred books of the Hindoos speak of three pyramids in Egypt, and they describe this as "The Golden Mountain", and the other two as mountains of silver and less valuable material' .(15)

In reference to 'Padma-devi', as mentioned by Wilford, It appears that she is a version of 'Brahma' the creator. We find that she is a part of the trinity formed with Vishnu and Shiva in Vedic myth. 'Worshippers of Vishnu, Shiva or Devi visualize the deity as containing all three functions (preserver, destroyer and creator) within one form or concept Shiva rides the bull; Vishnu flies on the divine eagle Garuda; goddess Devi mounts the lion'.(27)

4.36) A Suppository for knowledge - The idea that the pyramid was in some way a 'Suppository' of knowledge, has held the imagination of writers and thinkers. Some of the earliest accounts of the pyramids suggest a link with Hermes and Thoth. This idea is not as without foundation as it may at first appear to be:

Some Arabic-Coptic accounts of the Great pyramid say that it was once covered with inscriptions, some inside and some out. For example:

The story of King Saurid, as told by Murtadi (see Appendix C), includes references to 'two great mountains' and the 'mountain of fire'. He says that Saurid had a dream '300 years before the deluge' in which he saw the 'earth overturned', and that he ordered the pyramids to be built to 'write their wisdom upon them' and 'secure in them what was of most esteem....with the bodies of their kings....that the violence of the water might not destroy it'.

Also, according to the accounts of Masoudi, a papyrus, found in the monastery of Abou Hormeis, said to have been inscribed with 'Ancient Coptic characters', apparently said the following 'Upon the walls were written the mysteries of science, astronomy, geometry, physics, and much useful knowledge, which any person, who understands our writing can read' (2).Davidson makes an interesting suggestion, that the Coptic traditions had begun to confuse the texts and pictures of the 'Secret house' in the 'Book of the dead', with the Great pyramids chambers and passages, and that this is the origin of the myth of the internal passages of the pyramid having been inscribed within. The fact that there are no such inscriptions supports this idea.

Regarding the 'wisdom' inscribed on them, Herodotus reports that inscriptions of strange characters were to be found on the pyramid's casing stones and in AD 1179 the Arab historian Abd el-Latif recorded that these inscriptions were so numerous that they could have filled "more than ten thousand written pages". William of Baldensal, a European visitor of the early fourteenth century, tells how the stones were covered with strange symbols arranged in careful rows. However, in 1356, following a severe earthquake, the Arabs took fallen casing stones from the pyramid to rebuild mosques and fortresses in the Cairo, which had been levelled. As the stones were cut into smaller pieces and reshaped, all traces of the ancient inscriptions were apparently removed from them.

There are no known inscriptions inside, apart from the hidden graffiti. This leaves us with the casing stones. Should this wisdom have extended beyond the price of vegetables, as reported by Herodotus Petrie puts the issue to rest in his report; see extract below:-

Extract from Petrie :- With regard to the many records of inscriptions on the outside of the Pyramid, a few words are necessary. From the time of Herodotus down to the 15th century, inscriptions are continually mentioned, and their great abundance is described with astonishment by travellers. This has led to the supposition that the builders had left records inscribed on the outside, although not a letter is to be found on the inside. But against the possibility of this view, it must be remembered that no early inscriptions are found on the casing remaining at the Great Pyramid, nor on any of the innumerable fragments of those stones, nor on the remaining casing of the Second Pyramid, nor on that of the Third Pyramid, nor on the casing of the South Pyramid of Dahshur, nor on the casing of the Pyramid of Medum, nor on occasional blocks uncovered at the Sakkara Pyramids. In fact, not a single example of hieroglyphs has ever been seen on any casing, nor on any fragments of casing. The truth then about these numberless inscriptions appears to be that they were all travellers' graffiti. Strabo says that the characters were like old Greek, but were not readable; this points to Phoenician or Cypriote graffiti.. The accounts of the inscriptions given by the Arabs also show that they were mere graffiti; Abu Masher Jafer (before 886 A.D.) mentions Mosannad (i.e., Himyaritic) letters; Ibn Khordadbeh (10th cent.) also mentions Musnad letters; Masudi (11th cent.) describes them as being in various different languages; Ibn Haukal (11th cent.) says they were in Greek. Abu Mothaffer (alias Sibt Al Jauzi, died 1250 A.D.) gives the fullest account, mentioning seven sorts of writing : (1) Greek, (2) Arabic, (3) Syriac, (4) Musnadic, (5) Himyaritic (or Hiritic or Hebrew in different MSS.), (6) Rumi, (7) Persian. William of Baldensel (1336 AD.) mentions Latin; and Cyriacus (1440 A.D.) mentions Phoenician. Whether these travellers all understood exactly what they were talking about may be doubted; but at least none of them describe hieroglyphs, such as they must have been familiar with on all the tombs and other monuments; and they agree in the great diversity of the languages inscribed. The earlier travellers also do not describe such a great number of inscriptions as do the Arabic writers; suggesting that the greater part recorded in later times were due to Roman and Coptic graffiti.

Now among the hundreds of pieces of casing stones that I have looked over, very few traces of inscription were to be seen; this was, however, to be expected, considering that the pieces nearly all belonged to the upper casing stones, out of the reach of mere travellers. Three examples of single letters were found, two Greek and one unknown; and on the W. side, in one of the excavations, a piece was discovered bearing three graffiti, one large one attracting lesser scribblers, as in modern times. The earliest inscription was probably of Ptolemy X., showing portions of the letters Π T O ........... C ω T .......; the next was a Romano-Greek of a certain M A P K I O C K ......; and over that an Arab had roughly hammered in ..... m a j ...... This is the only example of continuous inscriptions yet found, and it belonged to one of the lowest courses; it is now in the Bulak Museum. Thus, all the fragments and the descriptions point to the existence of a large body of graffiti, but do not give any evidence of original hieroglyphic inscriptions.

When one considers the large number of graffiti which are to be seen on every ancient building of importance, it seems almost impossible but that the Great Pyramid —one of the most renowned and visited of all— should not have been similarly covered with ancient scribbles, like the host of modern names which have been put upon it since the casing was removed.* The statues Ramessu II., at Abu Simbel, bear quantities of Greek graffiti, in fact, some of the earliest Greek inscriptions known, besides Phoenician and Roman; the top of the temple of Khonsu at Karnak is crowded with the outlines of visitors' feet, with their names and particulars appended, in hieroglyphic, demotic, and Greek the inscriptions on the colossi of Amenhotep III. ("the Memnons") at Thebes, and on the Sphinx at Gizeh are well known; the long scribbles in demotic on the temple walls at Thebes have lately been examined; the corridors of Abydos bear early Greek graffiti; the passage of the S. Pyramid of Dahshur has two hieroglyphic graffiti, besides Greek; and there is scarcely any monument of importance in Egypt but what shows the scribbling propensities of mankind; be they Egyptians, Phoenicians, Greeks, Romans, or the worst sinners of modern times, Hellenes and Americans.

Comment - We can assume that the pyramid was, at some time, covered with text. Which most, if not all, was probably graffiti, the fact that it was not recognised as Egyptian hieroglyphs by anyone seems significant. Apart from the inscribed pyramid 'theory', some people believe that the 'information' was left in the dimensions of the pyramid. As the pyramid has been 'forcibly' entered, we are also at a loss as to what its original contents might have included.

Stailand Wake (24) suggested that the pyramids were 'intended to mark the substitution of an astronomy based on the passage of the sun through the twelve signs of the zodiac for the lunar astronomy which preceded it'. This idea is the same school of thought as Davidson.

4.37) An energy object (machine) - This idea is not to be scoffed at.  It is said that since the opening the air-shafts in the Kings chamber, that it maintains a constant temperature throughout the day and night.

Christopher Dunn argued that the pyramid was a functional 'machine'. If we explore the meaning of the word 'Pyramid', we find some support for this argument.

4.40) The word 'pyramid' translated. - The earliest symbols for pyramids were hieroglyphic.  The shape was not an exact triangle, but was used as a sign for a 'solar temple' (se Fix). Hawass points out that the pyramid shape is 'clearly related to the ben-ben, the symbol for the sun god' (13).

The Egyptian name for the pyramids is 'Khuti' - 'The lights'. Davidson (2) believed that this name originated from the semetic equivelant which was 'Urim' - 'The lights'. In Phrygian and Greek, the root 'Ur' - 'light', became successively 'Pur' and 'Pyr' (fire), and 'Pyra' (Plural), for 'Beacon fires'. In Chaldee and Hebrew, he adds, 'Middin' = 'Measures'. Hence the Chaldee-Hebrew name is - 'Purim-middin' - 'Lights-Measures'

Well known American Egyptologist Mark Lehner has stated that the ancient Khemitian term for pyramid was something he calls MR.Pyramid. Lehner bases this on his translation of MR as "Place of Ascension" following his belief that pyramids were tombs for kings and where the dead king's souls "ascended". But MR, usually written as Mer, is commonly translated as beloved, as in Meriamen (Beloved of Amen, The Hidden) or Meritaten (Beloved of Aten, The Wiser). Our indigenous sources tell us Mer meant "beloved" and had nothing to do with pyramid.

However, the ancient Khemitians apparently used the term PR.NTR, Per-Neter, for pyramid. Per means "house" and  Neter has been translated by Egyptologists as "God" or "Goddess". However, this could also be translated as "House of Nature, or House of Energy" for Per-Neter. The temple was Per-Ba (House of the Soul) and the tomb was Per-Ka (House of the Physical Projection) according to the indigenous tradition. With this understanding of Per-Neter as House of Nature, god or energy, we are given three different interpretations of the word 'pyramid'.

The Greek word 'Pyramidos' has an interesting meaning. If we support Dunn's ideas that the energy reactions in the Great Pyramid took place in the so-called Queen's and King's Chambers, then certainly it was 'Fire in the Middle'. Of course, the work by Davidson (2) puts this in a slightly better context, as the Greek meaning of the word 'Pyramid' means nothing if it came from a different root language.

J. Seiss, preferred the Coptic translation for the word. He said: 'In the ancient Coptic, "pyr" means "division", the same as "peres" in Daniel's interpretation of the handwriting on the wall; and "met" means "ten" putting them together -"pry-met"- we have the name given to this structure. And that name, in the language of the ancient Egyptians, means "The division of ten".' (15)

Chapman holds that the pyramid is born of the roots 'pyr', 'em', and 'us', meaning 'Far resplendent light/fire' (7).

Verner mentions that 'although Egyptologists themselves are not entirely certain as to the origin of the word Pyramid. Some of them derive it from the special mathematical or geometrical term per-em-us, which appears in the mathematical Rhind papyri I and II and expresses the height of the pyramid we should also mention that the ancient Egyptians themselves used the term 'mer' to designate the pyramid.' (20).

4.50) The 'Stonehenge-Giza' connection.

It has been pointed out by Petrie, Davidson, Michell, Gaunt and others that there appears to be a strong connection between the South of England and Egypt. Place names, Design, Dating, and plenty more all point to a possibility of research.

• Stonehenge was built on the same latitude as the angle of the Great pyramid (Or as near as possible at 51° 51').

• At Stonehenge, the sun sets at 51°51' on mid-summers day.