Ancient-Wisdom.Co.Uk

    ANCIENT - WISDOM. CO. UK           

Ancient Constructions

 
 
 
 

Keyword Search

 
 

Links to related sites

(Do you want to be linked with this page Contact-Us with your details)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If you know of any other Pyramids...

...please Contact-Us with references.

 

 

Add to Favourites A-Z Site Index Discussion Forum

E-mail us           

 

     Pyramids: (Form and function).

Middle east. Asia. South America. Europe.

Scroll down for more...

 

 

 

Pyramids - Form and function.

Pyramids were constructed by several cultures and continents around the ancient world.

 

The origin of the pyramid form - Egyptologists claim that the pyramid design developed (in Egypt) from the mud-brick Mastaba's of the first dynasty, into the stepped pyramid, then finally the traditional, flat-sided, stone pyramids, all in a period of around 100 years. (This theory also lays the groundwork for the claims that pyramids were built to house the bodies of dead pharaohs).

(Left to right - Saqqara-1st dynasty Mastaba 3504, Saqqara-Djoser-step, Giza-Khafre)

 

This theory is undoubtedly on firm ground,  but it is also true that the funerary aspects of the structures diminish at the same time at the astronomic and geometric influences increase. For example, in the 0 - 2nd dynasty royal cemetery at Abydoss, mounds, boat-pits and the proto-false door can all be seen, but there is no evidence of the pyramid shape, cardinal orientation, or polar shafts, suggesting the introduction of an unknown influence in the third dynasty.

What's the point? - There is much talk of the 'Primeval mound' in Egyptian text, and there have been suggestions that the Giza plateau may be that very place. It is also suggested that the pyramid shape originated from the primeval mound, represented in form by the ben-ben, then the obelisk. this idea is supported by the fact that the Memphite pyramids were aligned to Heliopolis.

The same shape is repeated in an 'inverted' form inside the pyramids.

Red pyramid, corbelled roof (left) and 'queen's' chamber of Great pyramid (right)

Causeways - All the 'memphite' pyramids were attached to the Nile via a causeway. Remnants of the Saqqara causeway, offer a glimpse of the original structures. Causeways were an important feature of early-dynasty pyramid complexes, and while their purpose is undoubtedly ceremonial, their exact function is completely unknown.

 

(The ceiling of the Saqqara causeway originally covered along its entire length, and was completely covered with painted stars)

 

The Function of a Pyramid: - It has long been argued that the original purpose of pyramids was funerary. While this may hold true for some later pyramids it is by no means the case for all as there are still no original human internments from any Pyramid in Egypt, and only one in S. America at Palenque. In addition:

  • The Ziggurat of Ur, Iraq (below) - Was a '7 Step-pyramid', and is officially classified as a 'Solar Temple'.

   

Note the buttress walls - similar in style to contemporary Saqqara.

 

  • Egyptian tombs always contained figures of Neteru, offerings or inscriptions, which are all noticeably absent from the earliest and largest pyramids at Giza, Dashur and Meidum pyramids. The pyramids of Giza, Dashur and Meidum also have extremely small passages, which is contrary to other Egyptian tombs, where ample room is provided in the passages or shafts for manoeuvring the sarcophagi.

  • As well as the traditional funerary association, pyramids are also credited with geometric and astronomical functions.

Q). Is it possible that all the evidence of geometric and astronomic influences is accidental?

A). There is no doubt that geometry was involved in the design of the Giza pyramids (amongst others). The inclusion of mathematical constants in the dimensions suggest an advanced knowledge of mathematics, such as:

  • The figure Pi ∏ (3.14), in the overall dimensions.
  • 3:4:5 triangle in the 'Kings chamber'
  • Sacred mean (1.618), in the ground-plan of the Ghiza pyramids.

(Click here for more about the geometry of Ghiza)

A). There is also no doubt that the pyramids of the fourth and fifth dynasties (at least), were built to incorporate astronomical observations, such as:

  • They were all cardinally aligned.
  • They all had Polar passages.
  • They were all aligned to Heliopolis. (see below)

 

  • The design feature visible in this overhead photo of the 'Great' pyramid at Giza, is only seen in one other pyramid, that of Menkaure, also at Ghiza. Strangely, it was not used on Khafre's pyramid, which sits at the centre of the complex, and attaches to the Sphinx and Valley temple via a causeway.

 

(Return to the top)

 

 

The Dashur (Snoferu) pyramids.

 

The Snoferu dilemma - Egyptologists believe (confusingly) that Snoferu, the father of Cheops, had the following three pyramids built for him.

  

 Left to right - Dashur (Bent), Dashur (Red), Meidum.

 

The Dashur pyramids remained a site of worship for well over 1,000 years. Snoferu's cult was still alive in the new kingdom. The traditional names of the pyramids are:

The Red pyramid - 'Snofero's northern pyramid'

The 'Bent' pyramid - 'Snoferu's southern pyramid

Meidum - 'Djed Snoferu' Sneru endures''

A decree from the time of Pepi I (6th Dynasty), which exempts the priests of 'the two pyramids of Snoferu' from certain taxes, was written in relation to the 'Red' and 'Bent' pyramids at Dashur. Cartouches of Snoferu have also been found on both pyramids (On the corner-stones and upper chambers of the 'Bent' pyramid), but none yet on the Meidum pyramid.

The information above suggests that the Meidum pyramid may have been constructed for another Pharaoh, although that still leaves two pyramids attributable to Snoferu.

Note - Snoferu is only credited with a reign of just 23 years (2,575 - 2,551 BC) (2), suggesting that he managed to move three times the amount of stone as his son, Cheops (Khufu), but in only half the time.

Note - Each of the pyramids was built in a completely different architectural style, with the bent pyramid showing two separate styles alone (The bottom courses of masonry curve upwards at the corners, while the top half are built horizontally as at Giza).

 It is noticeable that the two Dashur pyramids which are attributable to Snoferu align to Heliopolis, as do other pyrmaids built in the 4th-5th Dynasties (see below).

These facts cast a long shadow on the 'pyramids as tombs' theory.

(Return to the top)

 

 

Pyramids - Cross cultural similarities.

   

  

 The arrangement of the pyramids at Teotihuacan (Left), have been compared with those at Ghiza (Right).

 

 

The layout of the pyramids at both sites have been compared with Orion's belt (Above)

 

The similarity in arrangement of pyramids is also seen in the newly discovered pyramids in Italy (see below), and is also a common feature with English stone circles.

 

Teotihuacan, Mexico  

The Pyramid of the Sun at Teotihuacán has the same base dimensions and is half the height of the 'Great' pyramid at Ghiza. This means that the Pyramid of the Sun incorporates 'Pi' in the following way:

(4 x Π) x h = Perimeter / Circumference of base.

(Return to the top)

 

 

The alignment of Egyptian Pyramids.

 

It has been shown that many of the larger Egyptian pyramids from the fourth and fifth dynasties align to Heliopolis.

 
Pyramid sight lines at Abusir, Saqqara and Giza
 

It was Hans Goedicke who made some early suggestions. But they were not published first in a scientific journal, but in a newspaper in 1983. And what does the theory say? Well, Goedicke noticed that there seems to be a common constructional element at several necropolises: one corner of each structure is often on a straight line with the same corner of other structures in the necropolis. These alignments are found at Giza (south-east corners of Khufu, Kaphere and Menkaure), Abusir (north-west-corner of the pyramids of Sahure, Neferirkare und Neferefre), Saqquara (south-east-corners of Sekhemkhet, Djoser, Userkaf und Teti) - and even between necropolises as Goedicke thinks that the east face of Userkaf's Pyramid is aligned with the same face of Khufu's Pyramid several kilometres to the north.

Goedicke later concluded that these sight lines were aimed at the solar temple at Iunu (Heliopolis).

 

 
 
It appears that there are more alignments to be found at each site ...
 

Verner notes also that at Abusir, the 'Unfinished pyramid' was finally determined to have belonged to Neferefre, a suggestion which finds support in its placement at the southwest of the Abusir complex, suggesting a chronological placement. He says:

'As a precise geodetic measurement has confirmed, its northwest corner is on a line that already connected Sahure's and Neferirkare's pyramids and represented the basic axis of the pyramid necropolis at Abusir' (3).
 
 

As we can see, Giza has two sets of corner-alignments, not one.

Should we arrive at the conclusion that there was an overall design for the Giza complex, and a specific one too, then we are able to open our eyes to a new set of possibilities. It is also important to determine whether the great pyramid itself (and all of its chambers), was built from an original design. There are various definitive studies that show exactly that.

(Return to the top)

 

 

Middle eastern Pyramids

 

We have made mention of the Ziggurat of Ur, Iraq (right) a '7 Step-pyramid', which is officially classified as a 'Solar Temple'. The similarity in style with Djoser's step pyramid at Saqqara is too strong to ignore.

Both structures were built with mud bricks, built in steps, and both are surrounded by the same relief pattern on the walls (although at Saqqara this pattern is transposed onto the compound wall rather than on the pyramid itself as at Ur).

While it is generally accepted that these structures were the precursors to the fantastic building phase of the fourth dynasty builders at Giza, the process of evolution from one form to the other is still only guessed at. It is probable that at some time during this period an integration of ideas occurred that resulted in the final design for a pyramid complex which included cardinal alignment, causeway, smoothed faces, internal passages, blocking stones, portcullises and numerous other features, all built in stone.

The pyramids still stand as a testament to the achievements of the builders. Egyptologists have found themselves under constant pressure from researchers over the years to broaden their theory that pyramids simply served as large funerary structures. (Even though many have astronomical features included into their design, and the fact remains that no original internments have ever been found).

The Saqqara Complex - Saqqara was the northern Royal funerary complex in Ancient Egypt. 'Djoser's' step-pyramid is considered by Egyptologist's to be the Oldest Pyramid in the world. However, the observation of similar construction techniques at the Ziggurat of Ur (A stepped-pyramid, the use of mud-fired bricks, similar buttress walls), suggests that the two structures were contemporary.

  

 

 

The Saqqara step-pyramid was built with mud-fired bricks, identically fashioned (With mud and straw packed wooden frames), to bricks made in Mesopotamia long before the time of Djoser.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Photo (left) shows a part of the original enclosure walls. (note the similarity in style to the buttress walls on the Ziggurat of Ur (Above).

(More about Saqqara)

 

 

 

The Giza Complex - The Giza complex has long been recognised as one of the most spectacular achievements from ancient times. The origin and purpose of the site has been the subject of debate for thousands of years.

(Click here to explore the Giza complex in detail).

(Return to the top)

 

 

South American Pyramids.

 

  • In 1964, aerial photography identified nearly 1,000 pyramid sites in Peru (1)

Although the South American pyramids were undoubtedly constructed at a later date, there are certain construction features that suggest an 'old world' influence. For example:

 

Teotihuacan (The City of the Gods) - It was suggested by Stansbury Hagar that the city had been built as a 'map of heaven'. During the 1960's and 1970's a comprehensive mathematical survey was carried out by Hugh Harleston Jr. He found that the principle structures line up along the street of the dead (and beyond), and that the city was a precise scale model of the solar system, including Uranus, Neptune and Pluto (not rediscovered until 1787, 1846 and 1930 respectively. (21).

  

 Both the arrangement and the dimensions of the pyramids at Teotihuacan (above), have been compared with those at Ghiza

As well as having similar construction features on both continents, there are many other examples of Old-world/New-world cross-culturality, creating the strong possibility that pyramid building and solar worship were imported from the 'old world' to the 'new world'. (Click here for more about pre-Columbian contact between the 'old world' and 'new world').

(Return to the top)

 

 

Chinese Pyramids.

 

The Chinese pyramid fields are becoming recognised as one of the greatest pyramid concentrations in the world. The image below is from the region of Xian, which has over 100 pyramids in it.

- More to follow soon -

(Return to the top)

 

 

European Pyramids

 

Europe is the home to several pyramids, with more being re-discovered each year. The following examples illustrate that the tradition of pyramid building was far from restricted to Egypt.

 

Silbury hill, England 

 

Silbury Hill - Officially, Silbury Hill, in England is not a proper pyramid. However, its smooth exterior hides the several man-made steps which constitute the main bulk of the structure.

 

 

 

 

These (still unconfirmed) pyramids have been discovered in Bosnia -  Near the city of Visoko, 30km north of Sarajevo, there are five stone pyramids of monumental size, claims the Bosnian archeologist Semir Osmanagiĉ, who lives and works in the USA.

(Click here for more on the Bosnian pyramids).

 

 

 

 

Greece - At least 16 ancient pyramids are known across Greece. Examination by 'Optical Thermoluminescence' has determined that the oldest one dates to a staggering 2,720 BC. For more on this amazing news - follow this link...

http://www.ancientgr.com/Unknown_Hellenic_History/Eng/HELLENIC_PYRAMIDS.htm

 

 

 

Lastly - News of another European discovery which has been recently made: three pyramids were discovered thanks to satellite and aerial imagery in northern Italy, in the town of Montevecchia - 40 km from Milan.

They are the first pyramids ever discovered in Italy and the dimensions are quite impressive; the highest pyramid is 150 meters tall. They are stone buildings, as recent excavations have proved. However, they are now completely covered by ground and vegetation, so that they now look like hills.

The inclination degree of all the three pyramids is apparently 42° 43' (As seen on the 'Bent' and 'Red' pyramids at Dashur) and it has been suggested that there is a perfect alignment with the Orion constellation (a suggestion which appears valid, if the photo - right is correct).  There appear to be similarities with the Egyptian pyramids. At the moment, little is known about their origin or age.

(Return to the top)

 The 'Rough Guide' to ancient sites from around the world.

References:

1). D. Zink. The Ancient Stones Speak. 1979. Musson Bok Co.
2). M. Lehner. The Complete Pyramids. 1997. Thames and Hudson.
3). M. Verner. The Pyramids: Their archaeology and History. 2002, Atlantic Books.

About Us | Homepage | A-Z Site Index | Discussion Forum | Contact-Us