|
|
Links to related
sites
(Do you want to be linked
with this page
Contact-Us
with your details)
|
If you have any relevant
information for this page....
...please
Contact-Us with references.
|
|
|
Alignments- (And
orientation of prehistoric
sites)
|
It was a common
practice in prehistory to orientate and align constructions to
significant celestial objects or landscape features. They represent the communication between our ancestors and their
environment. This section of the site explores the themes most commonly
associated with these alignments and tries to interpret their meaning.
|
|
|
|
|
Scroll down for more...
So common was the
orientation of ancient structures that in-fact, it is rare to find a site that wasn't orientated
towards something or other. Although by no means exclusive, it is evident
that orientation was an integral part of almost all ancient constructions,
endowing them with properties which presumably re-enforced the function(s) of these structures.
|
Objects of orientation:
Cardinal orientation:
Many ancient structures were orientated cardinally, such
as the pyramids of Giza. Sites that have been
orientated in this way demonstrate a fundamental understanding of astronomy.
Lockyer noted that in Egypt, the majority of northern sites were cardinally
orientated cardinally (to the solstices), whilst in the south, there was a
preference for equinoxial orientation.
Solar orientations:
Although by no means exclusive, an extra-ordinary number of structures from around the
ancient world were orientated to important phases of the Solar cycle, and
solar worship seems to have been the dominant form of worship for several
millenia. For
example, the Hypogeum on Malta contained the
remains of approximately 7,000 humans, and both the entrance and the 'Holy
of holies' within the underground necropolis were found to be orientated to
the winter solstice. Similarly, the
West Kennet long-barrow
is orientated to the rising Sun. This connection between death and the
orientation to the Sun is repeated around the ancient world.
Lunar orientations:
There is an apparent transfer from lunar orientation (worship) to
solar orientation (worship) in important sites such as
Stonehenge and at
Carnac. The hundreds of recumbent 'circles'
in Scotland are orientated to phases of the lunar cycle.
Statistical proof of
lunar alignments has now been provided by an exhaustive study of 276 sites
in Western Scotland. The monuments concerned are not stone circles but
free-standing lines formed of usually two or three stones. The analysis
showed a strong preference for lines to the south-east. This implies that
the structures were deliberately aligned on the southerly limit of the
rising moon in its monthly cycle. (1)
Pleiades (The Seven Sisters):
Alexander Thom suggested that certain sites he examined were orientated
towards the seven sisters, the rising of which signified the beginning of
the agricultural year throughout the ancient world. (Pleiades sits at the
centre of our galaxy).
(Return to Top) |
|
Geometric Alignments.
There have been several suggestions
of evidence for prehistoric geometric alignments, that is - alignments
between ancient sites and/or landscape features which demonstrate
geometric principles.
Sir Norman Lockyer made the first 'professional'
observation of geometry in the lay-out of the ancient
landscape. He realised that a geometric
connection existed between
Stonehenge,
Grovely (Grove-ley) castle and Old Sarum. The three form an equilateral
triangle
with sides 6 miles long. The Stonehenge-Old
Sarum line is continued another 6 miles to the site of the present Salisbury
Cathedral, then the Clearbury rings and Frankenbury, while the
Stonehenge, Grovely castle
line is also astronomical as it is orientated along the path
of the summer solstice, and also connects other ancient sites.
Stonehenge has been shown to be connected to other sites
through geometry. In particular, the connection between
Stonehenge, Glastonbury
and Avebury, which also
extends to other important megalithic sites. The Glastonbury-
Avebury line is orientated along the line of the summer
solstice and the Glastonbury-Stonehenge line is also a part of
the great 'Decagon' discovered by
John Michell.
(More about
Geometric alignments)
(Return to Top) |
|
Ley-lines.
A look at some of the more popular
theories proposed to explain the frequency of alignments between
natural objects and megalithic constructions.
Most cultures have traditions and words to describe the
straight, often geometrical lines that run across landscapes, connecting ancient
or sacred features together. Usually the names given to represent these
invisible lines are translated to an equivalent of 'spirit', 'dream', or
'energy' paths. Apart from the physical presence of these connected sites however, little remains
from which to deduce much about their origin or purpose.
Their existence was suggested in
1921 by the amateur archaeologist Alfred Watkins, whose book The Old
Straight Track brought the alignments to the attention of
the wider public. He said of them:
"It is quite useless looking
for existing fragments, however old, of roads which may remain
from the first track, although, as we shall see, some bits may
form useful indications of its site. The changes from early
days have been so many in the matter of roads. We must
therefore clear our minds, not only of what we think of roads,
even Roman ones, but of our surmises, and begin again." -
Alfred Watkins (4)
(More about Ley-lines)
(Return to Top) |
The World grid.
How far do alignments
extend, and their relationship to each other.
The idea
that there may have once existed a so called 'World-grid' has been
explored by several people in the past.
Flinders
Petrie was the first respected European to conclude that Giza complex
had been placed geodetically, at the 'Geographic centre of the
land surfaces of the whole world'.
This theory has been expounded by several researchers including
Hancock and in particular Livvio Stecchini, who's work was highlighted
by Peter Tompkins ( ), who had the following to say on the subject:
'Because
of the advanced geodetic and geographic science of the Egyptians, Egypt
became the geodetic centre of the known world. Other countries located
their shrines and capital cities in terms of Egyptian 'zero' meridian,
including such capitals such as Nimrod, Sardis, Susa, Persepolis, and
apparently, even the ancient Chinese capital of An-Yang... As each of
these geodetic centres was a political as well as geographical 'navel'
of the world, an Omphalos or stone navel, was placed there to represent
the northern hemisphere from equator to pole, marked out with meridians
and parallels, showing the direction and distance to other such navels'.
(More on the World
grid)
(Return to Top) |
|
Earth-Navel's:
A look at the ancient
tradition of 'Earth Navel's'?. Features: Oracle
centres, Chakra's, the relationship between navels.
|
Coming soon.
'Mis-aligned' ancient constructions
-
(A difficult subject) - With so much orientation and aligning
going on, why do some sacred sites appear to be orientated
almost cardinally. Deviations of 5° - 8° are found commonly around the
world. Is this simply the result of a magnetic bearing, or perhaps something
else?
|
